What has smoking got to do with climate change?
DOUBT from The Climate Reality Project on Vimeo.
Do cigarettes contribute to the warming of the planet? Not really, but the deliberate manufacturing of public doubt in the face of widespread scientific evidence has been the hallmark of industry attempts to delay regulation in both cases. Not only has big oil used the same arguments and tactics as big tobacco, but in some cases, the same individuals. Certainly many of the same anti-regulation think tanks appear as sources of claims that are subsequently picked up and repeated in the mainstream media. Numerous publications have documented the history of these groups, who act as a PR smokescreen for industries in danger of serious public backlash over the dangerous activities from which they profit (for instance, Merchants of Doubt). The goal is not refutation of the science but merely the seeding of public doubt through the appearance of ongoing controversy on topics considered resolved amongst the experts. The question is how long they will be successful. For the link between cigarettes and cancer, such tactics effectively won the tobacco industry three decades of public confusion and regulatory hiatus in which to maximise profits. We don't have three decades in which to delay over climate.



4 comments:
have you read Toxic Sludge Is Good For You?
http://www.prwatch.org/tsigfy.html
No, I haven't. Is it good?
There's a psychological connection as well, in that both smoking and climate change are driven by forms of consumption well-known to be destructive in the long term, but whose deleterious effects are difficult to measure in the present, or are only incrementally measurable. The approaching "brink" is deniable (at least rhetorically/plausibly), which leaves enough wiggle room for the PR "smokescreen."
Yes, and in both cases, once the true extent of the danger has become bleedingly obvious (pardon the language), it is too late to do more than palliative care.
Post a Comment